Since President Trump’s inauguration, he has signed over 15 executive orders, implementing new policies indicative of the direction his administration is going and will go. While his immigration executive order that banned immigrants from seven different countries and was later rescinded has received the most attention, here are some more of his most recent orders.

Presidential Executive Order on Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda

Trump signed the executive order on Feb. 24, which ordered the head of each federal agency to designate an official as its Regulatory Reform Officer within 60 days. These officers would monitor reform policies from previous executive orders within their agency and ensure they are carried out properly.

“I’m not sure how it will work. There a lot of regulations are required by statute, so I’m not sure if the president has authority in this domain,” debater Kevin Xu (11) said. “Also, a lot of regulations are put in place by independent commissions.”

Presidential Executive Order on Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the “Waters of the United States” Rule

This executive order signed on Feb. 28 directed EPA administrator Scott Pruitt and the assistant secretary of the army for civil works to review President Obama’s 2015 Clean Water Rule. The Clean Water Rule extended federal protection to smaller rivers and streams in order to limit water pollution and gives protection to 60 percent of the US’s bodies of water. This is the first step by the new administration to potentially revise or rescind parts of the Clean Water Rule.

“President Trump’s action today endangers all who depend on clean water, which is every single person and business in the country,” Executive Director Marc Yaggi of Waterkeeper Alliance, an advocacy group for clean water, said in a press release. “Public health and our economy suffer when polluters discharge untreated sewage and industrial waste into any of our nation’s waters, including wetlands, streams, lakes, and rivers. Waterkeeper Alliance will fight every effort to destroy these longstanding clean water protections.”

Presidential Executive Order on The White House Initiative to Promote Excellence and Innovation at Historically Black Colleges and Universities

Trump signed this executive order on Feb. 28 acknowledging the important role of historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and to provide more support for these institutions by increasing the private-sector role and “enhancing HBCUs’ capabilities to serve our Nation’s young adults.” The order also establishes a board of advisors in the Department of Education that will advise the President on ways to improve HBCUs.

“President Trump’s Executive Order issued today is a significant and a positive first step in what we hope to be a productive working relationship,” Johnny C. Taylor Jr., president and CEO of the Thurgood Marshall College Fund, said in a statement. “We look forward to working with the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch to ensure the President’s funding requests and the subsequent budget approved by Congress put the necessary resources into black colleges so they can continue doing the important work America needs them to do.”

Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States

Trump signed a new immigration ban on March 6, overriding the previous one signed on Jan. 27, which implemented a 90 day ban on immigrants from seven Middle East countries. The new order suspends immigrants entries for 90 days still, but now only applies to six countries and immigrants who did not obtain a visa before Jan. 27. The order also aims to decrease the number of new refugee entries to 50,000 this year. While the new ban is more watered down from the initial one, Democrats still criticize it for discriminating based on religion, and more than 20 lawsuits have been filed in response to the signing.

“I think it’s making people not want to come to the United States because it’s not clear how things will go at the airport and what it will be like in the cities,” upper school European History teacher Byron Stevens said. “[There are] potentially unconstitutional things that it’s doing in terms of identifying a certain group of people, whether [] or not. But I think, like a lot of the proposals, it is attempting to score political points by solving a problem that isn’t really a problem.

This piece was originally published in the pages of The Winged Post on March 28, 2017.