During class meeting on Tuesday, nine sophomores presented speeches in front of their peers in order to be elected to the Honor Council.
Honor Council elections are held every two years and three positions are available for sophomores. In order to choose the first two members of the council, a “runoff voting system” is implemented. The two students with the highest number of votes will be granted the positions, while the last member will be selected by the Honor Council faculty and the administration from the remaining candidates.
All candidates unanimously emphasized the importance of honor in their speeches, but many expressed their different opinions on how it should be enforced. Some candidates believe that the system that punishes students who cheat with serious consequences is quite effective, but they would like to improve it in small ways.
“I think [honor] is enforced in practice mostly by threat of disciplinary action. I mean, you see a lot of people not doing dishonorable things just because they’re afraid of getting in trouble, right?” current Honor Council member Sahana Rangarajan (10) said. “ I think that if we want to change, we as a community should move together, rather than just one person or a small group being in charge and whipping everyone into shape with a reign of terror.”
Others believe that the harsh consequences that follow dishonorable behavior are not preventing students from cheating as some just become more stealthy in their methods.
“I don’t think harsh punishments are the way to go when it comes to honor. We need to help people understand that being dishonorable only hurts you in the long run,” Neil Movva (10) said. “I just think that by scaring people, you don’t stop them from doing it. They just work harder to not get caught.”
Some candidates had suggestions that would help remind students understand how to act honorably and make good choices.
“I think the best way to enforce honor would be to have more of the the honor case studies, which are where one person from each advisory has to go and discuss various cases regarding honor and then talk about them with their advisory,” Sanjana Kaundinya (10) said. “I thought talking about them made a difference and influenced people to think honorably.”
The class of 2015 had a record number of candidates running for the Honor Council, but eight of them were forced to retract because the speeches they submitted did not sufficiently address the prompt. The remaining candidates presented their thoughts in front of their peers, who will vote tomorrow to determine which chosen three will represent the class for the next two years.